Comments on: Britney Spears Sex Tape http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html List of the newest and hottest celebrity sex tapes out there Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:16:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: sex tapes http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-166 sex tapes Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:02:24 +0000 http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-166 Britney recently went to a hotel with a member of the paparazzi group that hounds her all the time. They went into the room and didn't return for hours and when they did, Britney was holding the dude's video camera. Oh please let that sex tape out... I cannot get enough of Britney Spears fucking. I wanna see that big round ass get pounded while she is taking the cock. Britney recently went to a hotel with a member of the paparazzi group that hounds her all the time. They went into the room and didn’t return for hours and when they did, Britney was holding the dude’s video camera.

Oh please let that sex tape out… I cannot get enough of Britney Spears fucking. I wanna see that big round ass get pounded while she is taking the cock.

]]> By: sex tapes http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-115 sex tapes Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:18:06 +0000 http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-115 Bullshit! Do you really need a model release to use the content? Do you need to give consent? I don't think so. The contenet is always owned by the photographer because the photographer created the photo - not the people in it. I don't think i'd want to see a video of her unless it was age 18. Shes has been cute for the last 4 years without photoshop or make up. Bullshit!

Do you really need a model release to use the content? Do you need to give consent? I don’t think so. The contenet is always owned by the photographer because the photographer created the photo - not the people in it.

I don’t think i’d want to see a video of her unless it was age 18. Shes has been cute for the last 4 years without photoshop or make up.

]]> By: sex tapes http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-114 sex tapes Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:17:33 +0000 http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-114 Once again, unless Britney signs off a model release and provides 2257 documentation, it can't be easily used commercially. That she was apparently drunk and passed on somewhere on the tape would also suggest that she wasn't in condition to consent to filming (to fill the model release) and understand what it meant. Major ass lawsuit, and not very much upside on this one. Load it up on your chinese tube sites and call it even. Once again, unless Britney signs off a model release and provides 2257 documentation, it can’t be easily used commercially. That she was apparently drunk and passed on somewhere on the tape would also suggest that she wasn’t in condition to consent to filming (to fill the model release) and understand what it meant.

Major ass lawsuit, and not very much upside on this one. Load it up on your chinese tube sites and call it even.

]]> By: sex tapes http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-113 sex tapes Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:16:49 +0000 http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-113 Heard the rumors too. The guy apparently filmed it secretly. He's from Hawaii. I say who cares. I like porn just as much as the next guy. But after all of the "celebrity" sex tapes that I've seen I could care less. They are all boring (with the possible exception of 30-60 seconds of the Pam and Tom tape), not to mention Britney is not hot anymore and probably boring as fuck in the sack. All this adds up to "who gives a flying fuck"? Heard the rumors too. The guy apparently filmed it secretly. He’s from Hawaii. I say who cares. I like porn just as much as the next guy. But after all of the “celebrity” sex tapes that I’ve seen I could care less. They are all boring (with the possible exception of 30-60 seconds of the Pam and Tom tape), not to mention Britney is not hot anymore and probably boring as fuck in the sack. All this adds up to “who gives a flying fuck”?

]]> By: me http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-96 me Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:24:12 +0000 http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-96 cool cool

]]> By: sex tapes http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-59 sex tapes Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:03:52 +0000 http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-59 <a href="http://www.snizzies.com/24/britney-spears-blow-job-video/">Britney Spears Blowjob Video</a> Britney Spears Blowjob Video

]]> By: sex tapes http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-58 sex tapes Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:01:18 +0000 http://www.sextapelist.com/britney-spears-sex-tape.html#comment-58 The judge said that because the singer had "put her modern sexuality squarely, and profitably, before the public eye", the article was unlikely to be considered defamatory. The magazine report claimed that the couple watched the video with lawyers after a member of their entourage threatened to release the footage. Ms Spears' legal team argued that was libellous because it "maliciously and recklessly portrays [Ms Spears] as acting 'goofy' while watching the video with the lawyers". But Judge Cole said Ms Spears had not brought the libel action for being "falsely accused of acting goofy". "The issue is whether it is defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in consensual sex," she said. The judge said that because the singer had “put her modern sexuality squarely, and profitably, before the public eye”, the article was unlikely to be considered defamatory. The magazine report claimed that the couple watched the video with lawyers after a member of their entourage threatened to release the footage. Ms Spears’ legal team argued that was libellous because it “maliciously and recklessly portrays [Ms Spears] as acting ‘goofy’ while watching the video with the lawyers”. But Judge Cole said Ms Spears had not brought the libel action for being “falsely accused of acting goofy”. “The issue is whether it is defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in consensual sex,” she said.

]]>